Best biography of mussolini

Mussolini

February 10,
This is the third book about Mussolini I have read from a British historian and it is definitely the worst. The style is odd, as Ridley appears to be going for chronological, but it comes across as fragmented and often he will double back to return to an event that happened earlier (for example, he explains how Italy won the Italo-Abyssinian War but then goes back to discuss the Hoare-Laval Plan). There is some genuinely good information to be learned from this book, hence the two stars. However, unlike Richard Lamb's "Mussolini as Diplomat" and Christopher Hibbert's "Rise and Fall of Il Duce", Ridley throws in very clumsy modern criticisms of Mussolini that come across as politically motivated (which should come as no surprise, given that Ridley ran with the Labour Party).
Ridley makes some statements that one will find frustrating if they go into this knowing anything about Fascist Italy. For example, he states at the end that Mussolini didn't want to surrender to America because Roosevelt was a cripple and America had blacks fighting for them, which Ridley claims Mussolini was embarrassed that his "strong, Italian Fascists" were being beaten by "Negroes". This is what I would call a Telling Statement, stemming from Ridley's desire to virtue signal. Italy had Eritreans numbering in the tens of thousands fighting for them (including Eritrea's founding father), Somalians in the thousands, Libyans in the tens of thousands, and Abyssinians as well. Given that Ridley does not back up this ludicrous claim with any quotes from Mussolini, this is simply an ad hominem and unjustified attack on Mussolini. Ridley does the same with the Ethiopian War which he paints as a war between Blacks and Whites, once again omitting that the Italians had almost , Eritreans and Somalians fighting with them in that war. While he draws attention to African Americans "hanging Mussolini in effigy" during the war, he forgets to mention Black Nationalist leader Marcus

Mussolini

The career of Benito Mussolini and the Fascist regime that became almost indistinguishable from it seem at last to be emerging from undeserved obscurity. For nearly two decades after his death, Mussolini’s role in contemporary history was blurred, overshadowed by the memory of an inglorious end. The Italian dictator’s gradual eclipse by Hitler, his repudiation in at the hands of his own people, his unworthy reincarnation as a puppet ruler in the North—the whole sequence epitomized by the final macabre scene of a horribly swollen corpse hanging upside down in a Milan square—all this so reduced Mussolini’s historical dimensions that he remained in our minds as little more than a figure of folly, of farce, of small-scale tyranny, or, at the best, of pathos. We forgot that the Italian Duce had ruled nearly twice as long as Hitler, that his had been the original Fascist system which gave the subsequent European movement its name and character, and that in the decade between Lenin’s death and Hitler’s accession Mussolini had ranked as the most dynamic of European leaders to whom the great of England and America were only too glad to pay their respects. Such is the full record which three recent books by British and American authors have tried to rescue from oblivion.

A large-scale analytical and critical study of Mussolini’s life has long been needed: neither Italian nor foreign historians have seemed up to the job. Only the beginning and end of his career have received detailed treatment. For the early years, there is Gaudens Megaro’s admirable Mussolini in the Making, a task of research carried out under the most difficult circumstances while the Duce was still in power, and for the bitter aftermath, F. W. Deakin’s recent volume, The Brutal Friendship, which reads more like a dossier than a finished book, but is irreproachable from the standpoint of scholarship. In the last half decade t

  • Bosworth mussolini
  • On October 31, , he entered office as the Prime Minister of Italy. He was 39 years of age. In the general election, his party, then known as the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, had received 29, votes out of million cast. How, then, did this ex-soldier, a corporal in the Italian Army in World War I, rise to head the government of one of Europe&#;s largest nations a single year after that election? Therein lies the extraordinary tale Antonio Scurati tells in M: Son of the Century. The book, half-journalism, half-fiction, is tantamount to a biography of Benito Mussolini.

    Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

    A fictionalized biography of Benito Mussolini

    Mussolini was a veteran of nine months in the trenches on his country&#;s northern border in its war against its erstwhile ally, the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He was a journalist, the combative editor of the revolutionary Socialist newspaper, Avanti. But when he advocated Italy&#;s entry into the war in , the Socialist Party had expelled him. And when the war ended four years later, Mussolini began building a base among the arditi—former front-line assault troops—and other &#;interventionists&#; in opposition to the Left. With funding from a wealthy industrialist, he established a new, Right-Wing newspaper, Il Popolo d&#;Italia, and used it to expound the confused and often contradictory political program he called fascism.


    M: Son of the Century by Antonio Scurati () pages ★★★★☆


    Mussolini&#;s fist six years in the public eye

    M: Son of the Century devotes nearly pages to the first six years of Mussolini&#;s rise to power. The novel opens in , when he launched the fascist movement with a tiny coterie of bitter ex-soldiers. It draws to a close in the middle of , when Mussolini brilliantly outmaneuvered his parliamentary opposition as they were on the verge of deposing him. From then on, we&#;re led to believe, Mussolini was unchallenged as &#;the only man who mattered&#; in Italy. In fact, Scurat

  • Best books on mussolini reddit
  • Ian Kershaw's two-volume biography is
  • This is not the most
  • .