Faux portrait diderot biography

In the fall of , I signed up for a French literature course at Eastern Michigan University. I loved the class and am indebted to our professor, Benjamin Palmer, who improved my understanding of great literature and its relationship to history. I enthusiastically enrolled in a second semester that winter and again enjoyed every minute. Throughout that academic year, however, nothing impacted me more than my firsthand encounter with an 18th-century copy of Diderot’s Encyclopédie.

The story of how Denis Diderot produced this masterwork, a volume encyclopedia containing more than 76, entries, is mind-boggling. In , he and the French mathematician, Jean-Baptiste d’Alembert, set out to create an encyclopedia that would describe and illustrate all available human knowledge. D’Alembert is often listed as a co-author but there is no doubt that without Diderot’s fanatical devotion, the project would have never come together.

In fact, there were many contributors but Diderot was chief among them, producing more than 7, articles. He also acted as editor, soliciting and proofreading thousands of contributions, working with engravers who created etchings of illustrated submissions, updating pages when new discoveries were made, and creating a master index of all articles and artwork. When completed, the Encyclopédie contained 17 volumes of articles and 11 volumes of illustrations.

It’s difficult to imagine the coordination and concentration needed to complete such an immense undertaking. Added to the complexity was the perpetual overhead of remaining in the good graces of a hypersensitive king and the even touchier Catholic church. Both of these powerful institutions had strong reservations about disseminating knowledge to the average citizen—Diderot’s ultimate target audience.

Indeed, Diderot was often under police surveillance and at one point he was sentenced and incarcerated in the prison of Vin

*Diderot, Denis

table of content
united architects – essays

table of content all sites

French, –
Although Denis Diderot wrote only a small number of texts bearing the title “essay,” his writing owes much to the essay’s conceptual and formal design. Those very essay traits have in fact contributed to a renewed interest in this philosophe’s texts and to a transformation of his legacy. Until the s, and from as early as 18th- and 19th-century criticism and commentary, intellectual historians and literary critics—Sainte-Beuve, the Goncourt brothers, and others—often judged Diderot’s thinking to be unfocused, digressive, even derivative. As compared with other 18th-century French Enlightenment philosophes—for example, Montesquieu (De l’esprit des lois [; The Spirit of the Laws]), Buffon (Histoire naturelle [–; Natural history]), Rousseau (Du contrat social [; Of the Social Contract])—and the 19th-century discipline of philosophy itself, it was thought that Diderot’s texts failed to produce either a new system of thought or of knowledge. Nor were his texts esteemed for any rigorous systematic method. In the last 30 years, however, those very properties of the essay which are characteristic of Diderot’s texts and of the judgment levied against him have taken on a different significance. Diderot has been projected into a new critical spotlight provided by contemporary criticism in semiotics and poststructuralist analysis.
Indeed, the same characteristics of Diderot’s writing which once served as the basis for negative critique now function in an opposite capacity as his indisputable intellectual and literary attributes, and in effect echo some of the basic literary and philosophical traits of the “essay.” According to Theodor W. Adorno (“Der Essay als Form” [; “The Essay as Form”]), the essay “does not let its domain be prescribed for it. Instead of accomplishing something scientifically or creating something artistically,” the essay thus can seem derivat

Trajan occupies the center foreground of this picture.  He looks, he listens to a kneeling woman, some distance away from him between two children. Beside the emperor, further back, a soldier restrains his rearing horse by its bridle; this horse isn't at all like the one required by Father Canaye and of which he said: "Qualem me decet esse mansuetum."  ("Get  me a tame one"). Behind the suppliant is another standing woman. Towards the right, in the background, the suggestion of a few soldiers. Monsieur Halle, your Trajan imitated from the antique is flat, without nobility, without expression, without character; he seems to say to this woman: Good woman, 1 see you're weary; I'd lend you my horse, but he's as temperamental as the devil . . . This horse is in effect the only remarkable figure in the scene; it's a poetic, gloomy, greyish horse such as a child might see in the clouds: the spots on its breast look just like a dappled sky. Trajan's legs are made of wood, as stiff as if a lining of steel or tin-plate were underneath the material. As a cape, he's been given a heavy g

p r o l o g u e

The full extent of Di derot's infl uence was not truly known, however, until a young German-American academic, Herbert Dieckmann, located the fi nal lost cache of Di derot's writings.

Having heard rumors that Di derot's conservative descendants continued to possess some of the lost manuscripts originally given to the writer's daughter, the Harvard professor fi nally obtained permission to visit the family château in Normandy in After overcoming the postwar suspicions of the caretaker, who was initially put off by his German-accented French, Dieckmann was ultimately directed to some armoires on the château's second fl oor. Entering a room that contained several large freestanding closets, he sidled over to the fi rst one and peeled back the door panel. Hoping, perhaps, to fi nd a lost work or two, he was confronted with an enormous stockpile of Di derot's bound manuscripts. So stunned was Dieckmann that he simply dropped to the fl oor. Di derot's fi nal cache, the lost collection of manuscripts he had given to his daughter, had at last been found.

What are now known as the Vandeul And how might a writer or philosophe effectively intervene in political affairs? These chapters tend to coincide with some of the many roles that the writer played in life: that of the playwright, the art critic, the science fi ction writer, the sexologist, the moralist, the father, the lover, and the political theorist and commentator. They also remind us why Di derot was the most creative and noteworthy thinker of his era, even though he chose primarily to speak to those who came after it.

PA R T O N E

forbidden fruits i. t he abbot from l angr e s In their fi rst "mission statement," issued in the mid-sixteenth century, the Jesuits declared the primary objective of a Jesuit education to be the "progress of souls in Christian life and doctrine, and the propagation of Both of these le